Marco Kusumawijaya, Architect, Jakarta
We should really push ahead with the reclamation of Jakarta's
coastal area. I mean "we" the public, not the four big developers
that will help the governor sue the environment minister for his
decree that deemed the reclamation project environmentally
unsound.
None of the developers is any model of good corporate
governance. Remember "Ancol Gate"? Remember floods? And I don't
mean reclamation in the sense of dumping soil from other provinces
in the sea north of Jakarta to create 2700 hectares of land
stretching two kilometers further out to sea.
We should reclaim the existing coast in the real social and
cultural sense. We've got to have a real public life there on the
beach!
After all, Jakarta has more than 30 kilometers of coastline,
but none is publicly accessible for free enjoyable time. And how
often do we see the sea during our normal working days? Don't tell
me I am asking too much. Just go to Makassar, where in one normal
working day the average citizen could very probably see the sea
twice. He or she can read the morning newspaper at the beach
before work, and after work have a sumptuous meal at the same spot
while enjoying the sunset. No entry fee. Likewise in Manado and
Baubau in North and Southeast Sulawesi respectively.
There's no need to mention cities abroad that have been too
often visited by many officials on their "study tours" without
even considering those nearer to home and making use of the
cheaper cyber tour through the Internet.
On its birthday, it is quite timely to think again of Jakarta
as a coastal city, because that is what it has always been for
more than 800 years. Yes, it is older than 576 years, the official
reckoning, based on the year 1527 when the Islamic prince
Fatahillah took over the capital. Settlements already existed in
the 12th century in the coastal areas of the present Sunda Kelapa
area.
Many other cities estimate their birthdays from the time they
were first settled in the Hindu or Buddhist period. The age of
Palembang in southern Sumatra is officially estimated at 682,
while Surabaya is said to be have been born in 1250.
Jakarta as we know it now really started only in stones when
Jan P. Coen built the present Jakarta Kota in 1619. Coen's was the
first intervention that really left a physical pattern that still
lives until now and determines the future forms of Jakarta. He was
Dutch, of course, and therefore not an acceptable figure as a
founding father of the city.
So the developers are not totally wrong to think of a beautiful
coastal line as the gateway of Jakarta. This dream was conjured up
by Sukarno already as early as the 1960's, albeit with a sense of
reclamation closer to mine than to theirs.
We need to feel the presence of nature, the cosmos, and
wilderness in this unassuming tropical metropolis. So we could
also encourage more presence of animals. We could bring the
monkeys from the mangrove swamp in Kapuk up to the National
Monument to play with the deer. (Do they get along well?). At
least the monkeys, who have been living there for centuries, are
more familiar to the heat of the city, unlike the distressed deer.
They might even cheer the deer up!
This will help save the monkeys, who are the real native
Jakartans if any, from extinction, as the mangroves are being
slowly damaged or "reclaimed" by both the surrounding developers
and fishermen.
As to the 13 streams that pass through Jakarta, we can clear
the banks of the slums and plant trees that attract birds. The
streams will lead our imagination to their sources, which are the
mountains up south. But we might not be able to bring the
mountains back to our sight in Jakarta, because the pollution is
too thick for our vision to pierce through, since the cars in
Jakarta will still produce 70 percent to 80 percent of all
polluting gases for the next 10 years or so.
That would be to my advantage because the pictures that I took
on last Feb. 18 from the JSE Tower 2, will be the last ones ever
showing the mountains in the south clearly. Even now, of all the
people whom I have shown the pictures, no one believes they are
real. They think they are computer generated collages.
And the trees along the river banks might not have time to grow
strong before they are flushed by the next flood, as the invisible
mountains will soon be brown instead of green, sending more and
more water as run-off downstream to Jakarta.
Or worse, the river banks will be reoccupied by the urban poor
after they return from Lebaran holiday, because there is no
security of land tenure, nor a realistic social housing program.
So won't greening the metropolis solve our problem? At least
you can never hate more trees.