Tertiani ZB Simanjuntak, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Public officials have admitted that the policy on development
in the capital was merely based on economic development and in
neglect of the environment, which must be protected and maintained
in order to achieve sustainable development.
"We've seen many breaches of the city planning blueprint, where
open spaces used as water catchment areas have been converted into
business zones, such as malls," said Gempur Adnan, a deputy at the
office of the State Minister for the Environment.
"Therefore, there should be a mechanism of communication
between the people, the administration and businesspeople to reach
a win-win solution where economic development and environmental
preservation can be achieved hand-in-hand."
He was speaking at a discussion held Thursday as part of the
2003 Indonesian Environment Week exhibition at the Jakarta
Convention Center, which opened on the same day. The discussion
revolved around the government's latest campaign: "My city is
clean and green".
Gempur's statement soon met with a response from Johan Silas,
an urban planning expert from the Surabaya Institute of
Technology. Silas said there should be no compromising with any
development plans that had a potential to damage the environment.
Referring to the experience of the Surabaya people when
businesspeople tried to turn the town's open space into a building
complex, Silas said, "No need to seek a win-win solution, because
we should not care about the financial losses of the
businesspeople. A good environment is a must. No compromise on
that."
The discussion also touched upon the Jakarta administration's
reluctance to proceed with a project to reclaim 2,700 hectares of
the northern coastal area, despite opposition from the office of
the State Minister for Environment, along with experts and
activists.
The reclaimed land from the project, which will be managed by
the Jakarta Waterfront City Management (PB Pantura), would be
allocated toward luxury houses, hotels, condominiums, industrial
zones, ports, business centers, mega shopping malls, offices,
seaports and recreation areas.
The project, the discussion participants pointed out, was a
glaring example of the neglect of environmental issues.
The latest analysis on the environmental impact of the project
reported that it would raise the sea level by about 12 centimeters
and damage the marine ecosystem because of the great amount of
sand needed for the project. It also said that pollution around
Kepulauan Seribu regency would increase and spark social strife,
as thousands of fishermen living in the area would lose their
source of income.
Wicaksono Sarosa of the Urban and Regional Development
Institute (URDI), a non-governmental organization, said it was
pertinent to revitalize Jakarta's northern coastal area, which had
suffered from erosion and pollution.
"To reach sustainable development, there are three main
concerns: the environmental, the economic and the social issues.
The reclamation is not necessary, because it would only further
damage the environment, not only in the coastal area but also here
in the center of the capital and surrounding areas," Wicaksono
remarked. House of Representatives legislator Tunggul Sirait also
shared Wicaksono's opinion.
Meanwhile, the chairman of the environment sub-commission at
the House suggested agropolitan development, which may lower the
number of migrants to Jakarta -- instead of reclaiming land, which
is aimed at increasing dwelling space.