In the 1980s environmentalists were delighted to find a
new mechanism to finance conservation.
In 1984, Thomas Lovejoy, deputy chairperson of the
World Wildlife Fund (WWF) in the U.S., proposed that
environmental organizations should enter the capital
market by "buying" developing countries' debts
from American and European banks at discounted prices.
Once the debt is bought out, the government of a debtor
country would no longer be required to repay the debt.
Instead, the government should do something useful for the
environment, such as financing conservation undertakings
in its own currency through NGOs.
Lovejoy's idea led to the establishment of an
international financial mechanism known as a "Debt
for Nature and Development Swap", or DNDS.
DNDS is intended to reduce a country's offshore debt by
commitment to supporting social development and natural
resources conservation.
In other words, DNDS is another way of writing off the
offshore loans by swapping them for the commitment to
mobilizing its domestic financial resources for
conservation activities.
The DNDS was first put to use in 1987, when
Conservation International (CI) purchased the Bolivian
government's debts amounting to US$650,000 at an agreed
price of US$100,000. In return, the Bolivian government
designated three conservation areas and injected local
funds worth US$250,000 for the management of these areas.
Since then, over 30 conservation projects in 20
countries have been implemented, resulting in the writing
off of debts worth some $177 million. In the Third World,
the debts purchased by international environmental
organizations have reached US$46.3 million. In return,
debtor countries have been required to make available
US$128.7 million to prove their commitment to financing
conservation.
In Costarica, the Philippines, Madagascar, Guatemala
and Panama, funds generated by this swap mechanism have
reached 95 percent of the total DNDS.
In Indonesia, top budgetary priorities have been the
repayment of offshore and onshore loans over the past
three years.
In the 2002 state budget, the servicing of offshore and
onshore loans -- both the interest and the principal --
will eat up close to Rp 130 trillion, or some 44 percent
of total revenues.
Meanwhile, development spending gets only Rp 47,1
trillion -- only about 2.8 percent of gross domestic
product as estimated in the 2002 state budget.
Indonesia's offshore loan burden is becoming heavier
with the obligation to pay ever increasing domestic debts.
By the end of December 2001 alone, Indonesia's domestic
debts will reach Rp 656.7 trillion, an amount of
outstanding debt that the Indonesian government will have
to pay until 2018.
Besides, as a logical consequence of the intervention
of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Indonesia
through its economic recovery programs, the government
will also have to pay the IMF US$1.3 billion this year.
This liability will continue to swell and next year
Indonesia is expected to allocate US$2.7 billion for the
payment of both interest and principal to IMF.
As a tight debt repayment schedule has been drawn up
for Indonesia, the budget allocated for debt repayments
will be larger than that for development.
The heavy debt burden has made Indonesia turn to the
DNDS scheme. The government has formed a team to make the
necessary preparations.
"The government is opting for the DNDS mechanism
mainly because the monetary crisis has made the burden of
interest and principal payments exceed the
threshold," said State Minister for the Environment
Nabiel Makarim.
DNDS, Nabiel believes, will reduce the state's
financial burden, particularly in the environmental
sector.
"I am of the view that DNDS will bring the
environment to the mainstream of development in
Indonesia," he said, adding that Indonesia should
concentrate on reforestation.
It has been predicted that DNDS in Indonesia will have
a small impact on the country's foreign debt repayments
but it will be significant for the government's efforts to
increase development funds.
According to Nabiel, the wealthy countries which have
given loans to Indonesia have no objections to the planned
scheme.
For example, the U.S. government has offered to support
DNDS through its Tropical Forest Conservation Act to
reduce Indonesia's debts to the American government.
The German government has also promised to cut
Indonesia's bilateral debts to ensure sustainable
development in Indonesia through DNDS.
The DNDS is a positive scheme. It is expected that more
countries will be interested in helping Indonesia and
other poor states.
Now, it remains up to the government to demonstrate its
skills in negotiating with creditors on DNDS.