Activists
urge probe into Musi River pollution
Thursday,
December 06, 2001
Bahrul Ilmi Yakub, The Jakarta Post, Palembang
Environmental activists have called for a transparent
investigation into the pollution on Musi River in
Palembang that has allegedly originated from a factory on
the river's banks owned by state-owned fertilizer company
PT Pupuk Pusri.
Budiman Kertopati, chairman of the local office of the
Environmental Forum (Walhi), and Taufik Anwar, chairman of
the South Sumatra Industrial Monitoring Forum (Forsip),
both called on Wednesday for an objective and transparent
enquiry into the pollution, in the light of the failure of
the local Environmental Impact Management Agency
(Bapedalda) office to publicize the results of an earlier
investigation that it had co-ordinated.
"I won't accuse Bapedalda of having colluded with
PT Pusri but it is better for all sides to conduct an
independent and objective investigation into the
case," said Kertopati.
Walhi quit a monitoring team set up by the Palembang
mayor last October, saying it lacked objectivity and
honesty in conducting its examination of the case.
An alliance of nongovernmental organizations accused PT
Pusri of polluting the Musi when thousands of fish were
found dead in the river last March and numerous people
living on the river's banks reported suffering from skin
diseases beginning last August. Pusri, which operates its
own waste water plant, has admitted to polluting the river
on two occasions this year, following leakages from a pipe
connecting the factory with its waste water plant.
Bapedalda says PT Pusri is no longer polluting the
waterway, since the company has repaired the leaking pipe
and is treating its waste water before pumping it into the
river.
However, it declined to unveil the results of its
analysis of the waste water.
According to Kertopati, the reason Bapedalda has found
no pollution is that it has not taken its water samples at
times when the factory has been pumping waste water into
the river.
"We are of the opinion that Bapedalda was not
serious in carrying out the investigation, " he said.
Taufik said he had learned from reliable sources that
Bapedalda had not been honest in presenting the results of
its investigation.
"Bapedalda produced two different reports. The one
delivered to the city administration shows the river
pollution is being caused by the fertilizer company's
waste water while the other one released to the public
says the company has treated its waste water in accordance
with the law," he said.
M. Yansuri, deputy chairman of the city legislative
council's Commission E on environment and social affairs,
said the Bapedalda report was not objective because it had
used PT Pusri's laboratory facilities to examine the
company's waste water.
"We will raise the pollution case in the next
hearing with the Palembang mayor and Bapedalda," he
said.
Jafar Abdullah, head of PT Pusri's environmental
division, hailed Bapedalda's examination of the factory's
waste water. He said that his company had already
conducted repair work to rectify the waste leakages.
"And now, the waste water dumped by the company
into the river is safe and in accordance with the
standards set by the government," he said, adding his
company would support an objective investigation into the
pollution.